Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

WF 100 First Year Writing

J. Van Slooten

The evaluation criteria on this page will help you determine if a website is credible. Many of these criteria use the lateral reading and going upstream methods that you are required to use for the Why Should I Trust This assignment.  The CAARP evaluation method can be used along with the methods outlined in your assignment to ensure a thorough evaluation of your resources.

Using the CAARP Method

Evaluating Resources using the CAARP Method

Currency

  • How recent is the information?
  • Is it out of date?

Authority

  • Who authored the information?
  • What are their credentials?

Accuracy

  • How reliable is the information?
  • Do the authors cite their sources?

Relevance

  • Does this information source have any real value to your topic?

Purpose

  • Does the information have a bias, agenda, or is trying to sell something?

If you cannot answer all or most of these questions, the information may be a bit fishy.


Visit the Strategies tab for more questions to ask yourself and strategies to use when evaluating sources, or visit the Rate My Source tab for an interactive tool to evaluate your source.

CAARP Method (Accordion)

(Click to expand each section)

  • Can you find a publication date, creation date, or copyright date?
  • Does the information seem out of date?
  • The currency of information will be more important for topics that require the most up-to-date information, such as the sciences.

Strategy: In a book, look towards the front for the publication year or copyright date. For an article, look at the top or bottom for a date. For a website, look at the top or bottom of the webpage.

  • Who is the author?
  • What are his/her qualifications, or credentials?
  • Is he/she an expert in that particular field?
  • How much has the author published?
  • Do other people make reference to his/her work?
  • Who is responsible for publishing the source or hosting it online?

Strategy: Do a Google search for the author's name and analyze the results.

  • How reliable is the information?
  • Can the facts be checked against other sources?
  • Are sources of factual information and statistics cited?
  • How does this compare to other information sources on the same topic?
  • Is the information free of spelling, grammar, and typographical errors?

Strategy: Search for an article, book, or website on the same topic and compare the information in both sources.

  • What is the depth and breadth of the information?
  • Does this information source have any real value?
  • How does this compare to other sources on the same topic?
  • Does it cover the same information? More information or less information?

Strategy: Look at the content. Do you feel that it provides enough information and will be helpful for your topic?

  • Does the information have a bias?
  • Does the information have an agenda, or trying to sell something?
  • How does the viewpoint compare to other information sources on the same topic?

Strategy: Read the text. Does it seem like the content simply conveys information, or is it trying to persuade?